Keyword summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos1,044 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Real Housewives Of Beverly Hills results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 511 hits. Analysis detected 4,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,742 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (13,161 of 37,536 keywords). This Real Housewives Of Beverly Hills is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Real Housewives Of Beverly Hills
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,742
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos