Keyword summary
69%1 analyzed article/video493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raw Chicken results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 460 hits. Analysis detected 1,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (15,693 of 55,700 keywords). This Raw Chicken is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Raw Chicken
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
72%Raw Chicken (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos