Keyword summary
38% 1 analyzed article/video 1,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rate Of Profit results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Begging the Question , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 984 hits . Analysis detected 4,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,830 of 37,536 keywords). This Rate Of Profit is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Rate Of Profit
Keyword details
Total words: 5,028
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst