Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rapid Response results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 976 hits. Analysis detected 5,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,369 of 37,536 keywords). This Rapid Response is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Rapid Response
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
86%Rapid Response (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 29.6%29.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 29.7%29.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 21.7%21.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 29.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 29.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos