Keyword summary
100% 2 analyzed articles/videos 253 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Randi Weingarten results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48.7% saturation with 841 hits . Analysis detected 6,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,376 of 35,444 keywords). This Randi Weingarten is worse (more manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Randi Weingarten
Keyword details
Total words: 1,728
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.3% percentile 8.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 48.7% 48.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 34.8% 34.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 31.6% 31.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 19.0% 19.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 30.4% 30.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 48.7%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 34.8%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 31.6%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Straw Man: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst