Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Randhir Jaiswal results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 2,319 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Randhir Jaiswal is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Randhir Jaiswal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Randhir Jaiswal (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.6%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos