BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 355 hits. Analysis detected 1,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 828 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,337 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the article peer group.

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP)  U.S. 
President Donald Trump threatened Thursday to launch major strikes on Iran and seize control of its oil and gas industries as continuing attacks between the warring countries pushed the Middle East closer to the resumption of a full-scale war. 
Trump said in a social media post that the U.S. would hit Iran “VERY HARD TONIGHT” and would “assume total control” of Iran’s oil and gas industries, including the key Kharg Island oil terminal, in the “not too distant future.” 
Trump compared his plans for Iran to how the U.S. assumed control of Venezuela’s oil sector after capturing then-president Nicolás Maduro in January. 
The post come after the U.S and Iran traded strikes for a second straight day. 
The American attack, which lasted into Thursday morning in Iran, appeared more intense and widespread than the day before. 
Iran released little information on the extent of the damage and said it fired back at Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan, as it had a day before. 
It was the third time this week that back-and-forth strikes have rattled the Middle East. 
The first involved attacks between Iran and Israel, followed by the two rounds of fire between the U.S. and Iran, which hit countries in the region that host American bases. 
The two sides also remain at odds over Iran’s nuclear program, which Tehran insists is peaceful but which the U.S. and Israel fear could be used to build an atomic weapon due to its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. 
The U.S. and Israel said a major reason they went to war on Feb. 28 was to ensure that Iran would never be able to do that. 
Iran has insisted that any deal to end the war must also end fighting in Lebanon between its ally Hezbollah and Israel. 
But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appears intent on pursuing his goal of destroying the militant group. 
US strikes Iran and Iran fires back at Gulf states 
Central Command said its latest round of airstrikes came “in response to Iran’s unwarranted and continued aggression” and targeted “Iranian military surveillance capabilities, communication systems and air defense sites.” 
It did not elaborate on the damage done by the strikes, which it said ended just before sunrise Thursday in Iran. 
Explosions from the strikes echoed around Iran’s capital, as well as the port city of Bandar Abbas and other southern areas along the Strait of Hormuz. 
Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard later said sites hit included a manufacturing complex, a military barracks and a local Guard base outside of Tehran. 
Kuwait closed its airspace for several hours because of the attack, but did not elaborate on any damage. 
Jordan said it intercepted 20 Iranian missiles fired toward an area that is home to a base hosting U.S. troops, though no one was hurt. 
Bahrain’s Interior Ministry said an 11-year-old girl was hurt and cars and homes were damaged by debris from interceptions responding to the Iranian attack. 
Meanwhile, Israel warned residents in the country’s north to seek shelter after the detection of suspected incoming fire from Lebanon, where Israel is fighting the Iran-allied Hezbollah militant group. 
Trump says the US is sneaking oil through the Strait of Hormuz 
Iran’s ability to control the Strait of Hormuz has proved a strong bargaining chip since the narrow waterway’s effective closure has severely disrupted the global economy. 
Trump said Wednesday that the U.S. military has undertaken a mission since last month to sneak oil shipments past Iran’s forces in the strait, aided by the destruction of Iranian radar equipment. 
Trump said as a result more than 100 million barrels of oil have evaded Iran’s chokehold. 
There was no immediate confirmation of that figure, which equals roughly five days of oil shipments through the waterway before the war began. 
But the seas remain dangerous for mariners. 
The U.S. military’s Central Command said Thursday that it struck a Guinea-Bissau-flagged tanker attempting to evade the American blockade with a shipment of Iranian oil. 
It said Hellfire missiles were launched to disable the M/T Jalveer late Wednesday after the ship’s crew failed to obey U.S. orders. 
It’s the ninth merchant vessel the U.S. military says it has disabled since imposing the blockade in mid-April in waters off Iran. 
Two of those ships came under U.S. fire earlier this week. 
Three Indian sailors were killed when American forces struck the Palau-flagged M/T Settebello on Tuesday, Indian Ports, Shipping and Waterways Minister Sarbananda Sonowal announced Thursday on X. 
The mariners had initially been reported missing. 
U.S. 
Central Command said American forces issued warnings before firing on the ship, which it accused of trying to evade the blockade. 
The leader of the International Maritime Organization, a United Nations agency, condemned the attack. 
India’s foreign ministry summoned a senior U.S. diplomat to convey its “deepest concerns” over the attack and formally protest the strike, spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.7%Jon Gambrell: 2.0%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias15.7%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.8%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.8%This article: 2.8%Jon Gambrell: 2.3%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias2.8%This article: 7.7%Jon Gambrell: 10.2%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 2.1%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias8.7%This article: 25.7%Jon Gambrell: 11.1%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias25.7%This article: 1.9%Jon Gambrell: 1.6%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias1.9%This article: 4.7%Jon Gambrell: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error4.7%This article: 4.7%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.1%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Jon Gambrell: 1.6%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 42.9%Jon Gambrell: 3.6%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority42.9%This article: 3.9%Jon Gambrell: 1.4%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma3.9%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.2%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.3%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning3.3%This article: 2.3%Jon Gambrell: 2.3%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization2.3%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.5%Jon Gambrell: 5.0%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion9.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.9%Jon Gambrell: 3.5%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.9%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.3%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.6%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.7%Jon Gambrell: 2.1%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.7%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.8%Jon Gambrell: 3.0%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote4.8%This article: 4.8%Jon Gambrell: 1.7%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection4.8%This article: 6.8%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice6.8%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

828 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers44%attributed speech463writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 40 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBenjamin Netanyahu • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageRevolutionary Guard • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageBahrain’s Interior Ministry • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSarbananda Sonowal • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 21 words • 0.0% coverageInternational Maritime Organization • 14 words • 0.0% coverageRandhir Jaiswal • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

79%flagged-word coverage
111 attributed words30% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Biased Writer Voice+50.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 50.5%50.5%Unattributed Quote+36.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 36.0%36.0%Quote-first Misdirection+36.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 36.0%36.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.