Keyword summary
43% 3 analyzed articles/videos 672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rahm Emanuel results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 762 hits . Analysis detected 5,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,420 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,525 of 37,536 keywords). This Rahm Emanuel is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Rahm Emanuel
Keyword details
Total words: 6,420
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst