Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rafael Mandelman results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 640 hits . Analysis detected 4,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,443 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Rafael Mandelman is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Rafael Mandelman
Keyword details
Total words: 4,443
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst