Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racial Gerrymander results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 1,026 hits. Analysis detected 6,431 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,314 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,715 of 37,536 keywords). This Racial Gerrymander is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Racial Gerrymander
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
56%Racial Gerrymander (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,314
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos