Keyword summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 434 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Zoe results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 225 hits . Analysis detected 1,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,302 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,668 of 35,607 keywords). This Rachel Zoe is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Rachel Zoe
Keyword details
Total words: 1,302
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst