Keyword summary
73% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These R And B results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 2,789 hits . Analysis detected 15,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,832 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,729 of 37,536 keywords). This R And B is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. R And B
Keyword details
Total words: 16,832
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst