Keyword summary
34%2 analyzed articles/videos654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pyrocumulus Clouds results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Recency Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 3,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,312 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (31,101 of 37,536 keywords). This Pyrocumulus Clouds is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Pyrocumulus Clouds
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
18%Pyrocumulus Clouds (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,312
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510017.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos