Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Purl Program results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 501 hits . Analysis detected 3,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,010 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,094 of 34,833 keywords). This Purl Program is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Purl Program
Keyword details
Total words: 2,010
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.6% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 22.9% 22.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.9% 24.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst