Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 4,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Purges results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 2,259 hits . Analysis detected 14,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (31,073 of 37,536 keywords). This Purges is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group. Purges
Keyword details
Total words: 17,788
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst