Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Punishments results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 3,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,366 of 37,536 keywords). This Punishments is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Punishments
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
54%Punishments (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos