Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Policy Institute Of California results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 864 hits. Analysis detected 4,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,196 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (16,774 of 35,805 keywords). This Public Policy Institute Of California is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Public Policy Institute Of California
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
54%Public Policy Institute Of California (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,196
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510053.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos