KQED61%

New Poll Finds Race for California Governor Remains Deadlocked0%

By Guy Marzorati71%

2/26/2026, 2:01:40 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 687 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,197 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

California’s race for governor remains deadlocked with just over two months until voting begins in the June 2 primary, according to a survey released Wednesday by the Public Policy Institute of California. 
No clear frontrunner has emerged among the roughly dozen contenders vying to succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is termed out. 
Republican commentator Steve Hilton leads the field with the support of 14% of likely voters, followed by former Rep. Katie Porter, a Democrat, at 13%. 
Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, a Republican, received 12%, followed by two Democrats  Rep. Eric Swalwell at 11% and investor Tom Steyer at 10%. 
The poll’s margin of error was 3.9%. 
In California’s top-two system, the two candidates who receive the most votes in the primary advance to the general election, regardless of party  meaning a crowded Democratic field could allow Hilton and Bianco to effectively lock Democrats out of November. 
“No telling at this point who the top two candidates are going to be  and whether they’re going to be Democrats or Republicans that are going to be running for governor in November,” said Mark Baldassare, PPIC statewide survey director. 
Recent polling  both public surveys and private polling commissioned by campaigns  has found a consistent top five. 
An Emerson College survey released last week found Hilton at 17%, Swalwell and Bianco at 14%, Porter at 10% and Steyer at 9%. 
Swalwell and Steyer entered the race late last year, months after Porter, Bianco and Hilton. 
Swalwell has used his high-profile perch in Congress to remain a visible critic of President Donald Trump, while Steyer has tapped his own wealth to spend more than $27 million on a barrage of television ads. 
“When [Swalwell and Steyer] entered the race, support for two Democrats declined: Katie Porter’s support declined and Xavier Becerra’s support declined,” Baldassare said. 
“That’s where the movement has been.” 
Becerra, the former U.S. secretary of Health and Human Services and California attorney general, finished at 5% in the PPIC poll  tied with Democrats Antonio Villaraigosa, the former mayor of Los Angeles, and Betty Yee, the former state controller. 
Other Democrats in the poll included San José Mayor Matt Mahan, who received support from 3% of likely voters, State Superintendent Tony Thurmond at 2% and former state Assemblymember Ian Calderon at 1%. 
The crowded Democratic field prevented any candidate from reaching the 60% delegate support required to secure the state party’s endorsement at its convention last weekend in San Francisco. 
“The Republican vote is going to be split two ways versus a Democratic vote that could be split  I mean, we have nine major candidates, it could be split into pieces,” said Nancy Tung, chair of the San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee. 
“It’s not a negligible concern; it’s definitely something I think about.” 
Baldassare said a Hilton-Bianco general election is possible, “but I wouldn’t say it’s probable.” 
The PPIC poll found a smaller share of Republicans (5%) than Democrats (10%) were undecided. 
Rusty Hicks, the chair of the California Democratic Party, said the field would shrink before voting begins in early May. 
“I think in many ways the primary process itself is going to do some of the winnowing  whether it is traction that candidates get with voters across the state, those who are able to raise the resources to communicate a message, those who land significant endorsements and supporters.” 
But even the landscape of key Democratic endorsements remains splintered. 
On Tuesday, the powerful union SEIU California stopped short of endorsing anyone in the race, instead issuing an anti-endorsement of Hilton, Bianco and Mahan  a business-friendly Democrat who has sparred with labor in the past. 
In a statement, SEIU California President David Huerta added a gentle nudge for some low-polling candidates to begin heading toward the exits. 
“SEIU members urge candidates who have not built the coalition, campaign, and resources to compete in a statewide race of this magnitude to seriously reconsider their candidacy and re-focus their leadership on advancing a more just and equitable future for California’s working families,” Huerta said. 
KQED’s Scott Shafer contributed to this story. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.8%Guy Marzorati: 1.5%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias2.8%This article: 3.3%Guy Marzorati: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias3.3%This article: 3.3%Guy Marzorati: 1.9%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.3%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 29.7%Guy Marzorati: 6.9%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect29.7%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.4%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.1%Guy Marzorati: 0.8%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.0%Guy Marzorati: 3.5%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias10.0%This article: 12.4%Guy Marzorati: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias12.4%This article: 4.4%Guy Marzorati: 5.0%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias4.4%This article: 1.6%Guy Marzorati: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Guy Marzorati: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias15.9%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.3%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Guy Marzorati: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Guy Marzorati: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.2%Guy Marzorati: 3.1%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority27.2%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 6.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope6.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 2.6%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.2%Guy Marzorati: 3.5%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion8.2%This article: 7.1%Guy Marzorati: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question7.1%This article: 3.3%Guy Marzorati: 1.6%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.3%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.8%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground2.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 3.4%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 2.4%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

687 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.