Keyword summary
84%1 analyzed article/video903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Input results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 2,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,709 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,344 of 37,536 keywords). This Public Input is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Public Input
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
65%Public Input (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,709
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510064.5% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.3%14.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos