Keyword summary
76%2 analyzed articles/videos1,713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Hearings results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 885 hits. Analysis detected 5,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,139 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,373 of 37,536 keywords). This Public Hearings is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Public Hearings
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
46%Public Hearings (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,139
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.2%17.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos