Keyword summary
35%1 analyzed article/video1,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Contracting results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 525 hits. Analysis detected 2,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,243 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,711 of 37,536 keywords). This Public Contracting is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Public Contracting
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Public Contracting (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,243
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos