Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Puberty Blockers results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 3,874 hits. Analysis detected 26,242 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,650 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,666 of 37,536 keywords). This Puberty Blockers is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Puberty Blockers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
75%Puberty Blockers (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,650
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.9%23.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 30.6%30.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 22.9%22.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 30.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos