Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pseudo Science results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 1,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,098 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,204 keywords). This Pseudo Science is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Pseudo Science
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Pseudo Science (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,098
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos