Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Protein Snacks results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 53.7% saturation with 685 hits. Analysis detected 2,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Protein Snacks is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Protein Snacks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Protein Snacks (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 53.7%53.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.2%17.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 53.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos