Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prospect Park results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 445 hits . Analysis detected 4,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,224 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,195 of 37,536 keywords). This Prospect Park is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Prospect Park
Keyword details
Total words: 7,224
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst