Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Proposition B results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 1,027 hits . Analysis detected 4,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,583 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,753 of 37,536 keywords). This Proposition B is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Proposition B
Keyword details
Total words: 3,583
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 28.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Red Herring: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst