Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Proposal results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Loss Aversion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,685 hits . Analysis detected 14,362 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,842 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,220 of 37,536 keywords). This Proposal is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Proposal
Keyword details
Total words: 14,842
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst