Keyword summary
4%1 analyzed article/video1,832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Project Ninja results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 2,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (31,369 of 35,943 keywords). This Project Ninja is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Project Ninja
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
13%Project Ninja (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510012.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos