Keyword summary
83%1 analyzed article/video1,242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Project Cranberry results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 1,262 hits. Analysis detected 8,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,397 of 35,936 keywords). This Project Cranberry is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Project Cranberry
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
77%Project Cranberry (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510076.6% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 25.4%25.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.9%19.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.2%13.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos