Keyword summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Professors results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 957 hits . Analysis detected 6,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,181 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,146 of 34,978 keywords). This Professors is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. Professors
Keyword details
Total words: 2,181
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.0% percentile 7.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 43.9% 43.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 34.8% 34.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 24.8% 24.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 19.4% 19.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 43.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 34.8%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 3.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst