Keyword summary
84%2 analyzed articles/videos357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Productivity Growth results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,289 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,689 of 37,536 keywords). This Productivity Growth is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Productivity Growth
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
91%Productivity Growth (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,289
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

90% percentile
025507510090.2% percentile
7.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.8%16.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 24.1%24.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.2%12.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate