Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Processed Foods results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 587 hits. Analysis detected 3,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,403 of 37,536 keywords). This Processed Foods is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Processed Foods
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
33%Processed Foods (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,880
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos