Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Princess Charlotte results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 1,045 hits. Analysis detected 4,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (4,434 of 35,444 keywords). This Princess Charlotte is worse (more manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Princess Charlotte
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠88%Princess Charlotte (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510087.5% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 38.2%38.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 32.8%32.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 38.2%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 32.8%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos