Keyword summary
76% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prince George results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 1,045 hits . Analysis detected 4,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,698 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,911 of 37,536 keywords). This Prince George is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Prince George
Keyword details
Total words: 4,698
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.2% 22.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CBC 49% 7/25/2026, 1:00:00 AM