Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Prime Minister Mark Carney results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 835 hits. Analysis detected 3,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,869 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Prime Minister Mark Carney is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Prime Minister Mark Carney

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos