Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Line Of Succession results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , In-Group Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 350 hits . Analysis detected 1,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,287 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,474 of 37,536 keywords). This Presidential Line Of Succession is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Presidential Line Of Succession
Keyword details
Total words: 1,287
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.7% percentile 7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 23.3% 23.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 27.2% 27.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 27.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst