Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Bid results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 996 hits . Analysis detected 6,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,632 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,554 of 37,536 keywords). This Presidential Bid is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Presidential Bid
Keyword details
Total words: 5,632
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst