Keyword summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Ambitions results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 550 hits . Analysis detected 3,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,920 of 37,536 keywords). This Presidential Ambitions is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group. Presidential Ambitions
Keyword details
Total words: 1,884
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.2% percentile 5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 29.2% 29.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst