Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Preservationists results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 1,330 hits. Analysis detected 5,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 35,814 keywords). This Preservationists is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Preservationists
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Preservationists (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 39.1%39.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 25.8%25.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 39.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos