Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prediabetes results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Biased Writer Voice , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 371 hits . Analysis detected 2,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (18,929 of 35,713 keywords). This Prediabetes is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. Prediabetes
Keyword details
Total words: 3,084
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst