Keyword summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video1,209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ppd’s Real Time Crime Center results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 640 hits. Analysis detected 3,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (21,181 of 55,304 keywords). This Ppd’s Real Time Crime Center is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Ppd’s Real Time Crime Center
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠62%Ppd’s Real Time Crime Center (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,836
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos