Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Power Strip results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 849 hits. Analysis detected 3,312 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (14,705 of 37,536 keywords). This Power Strip is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Power Strip
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠61%Power Strip (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510060.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 20.8%20.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.2%10.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos