Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Power And Impunity results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 36.4% saturation with 1,108 hits. Analysis detected 8,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,045 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,462 of 37,536 keywords). This Power And Impunity is worse (more manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Power And Impunity
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
94%Power And Impunity (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,045
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510093.4% percentile
8.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 36.4%36.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 35.3%35.3%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 14.3%14.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 14.0%14.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 36.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 35.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 1.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Middle Ground: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos