Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pop Tarts results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Bandwagon , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 66.1% saturation with 680 hits . Analysis detected 2,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,029 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,344 of 37,536 keywords). This Pop Tarts is worse (more manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Pop Tarts
Keyword details
Total words: 1,029
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.8% percentile 9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 66.1% 66.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 31.4% 31.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 66.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 31.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.0%, sitewide 19.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst