Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Politically Speaking Hour results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,592 hits . Analysis detected 15,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,021 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (31,843 of 35,712 keywords). This Politically Speaking Hour is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Politically Speaking Hour
Keyword details
Total words: 20,021
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles20K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst