STLPR0%

What Jennifer Lopez taught me about being a Missourian 28%

By Jason Rosenbaum0%

6/26/2026, 3:19:20 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 1,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 848 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (14,766 of 20,371 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the article peer group.

I’ve encountered some unexpected things as a Missouri political reporter. 
But I didn’t expect Jennifer Lopez to prompt an existential examination into my geographical identity. 
The actress and singer caused a ruckus when she said earlier this month on the online show “Subway Takes” that you have to be born in New York to be considered a New Yorker: 
The reason this clip caught my attention has little to do with New York City. 
Yes, I did jump on the New York Knicks bandwagon recently. 
But that had everything to do with the NBA Finals MVP Jalen Brunson being an alumnus of my high school, Adlai E. 
Stevenson High School in Lincolnshire, Illinois. 
But I’ve occasionally wondered whether I can consider myself a Missourian  even though I was born in Chicago and raised in the Chicago suburbs. 
I moved to Missouri to attend college and have remained a resident of the state for more than half of my life. 
Now, I’m sure some of you are wondering: “Jason, why does this matter? 
This is America! 
You can call yourself whatever you want.” 
It matters because I’m a stickler for the facts. 
And I want to know for sure if my three kids, who were born in Missouri, are considered fourth- or fifth-generation Missourians. 
I have deep ties to both St. 
Louis and Kansas City, with members of my family living in the state since the early 1900s. 
So about five years ago, I conducted an extremely scientific survey of two Missouri politicians about whether I could call myself a Missourian. 
Then-Gov. 
Mike Parson said no. 
Former U.S. 
Sen. 
Claire McCaskill said yes. 
With that survey hopelessly deadlocked, I recently asked people on social media whether you had to be born in Missouri to be considered a Missourian. 
And the response was  mixed. 
St. 
Louis resident Kate Stowe contended that we “should be welcoming people, not drawing lines around who’s ‘Missourian’ enough.” 
And she may have a point. 
When politicians have to stress that they’re fourth- or fifth- or sixth- or seventh-generation Missourians, it does give the impression that only people with deep bloodlines are qualified for elected office. 
Others, though, are fine identifying from where they previously lived. 
Christy McVicker Ryan of St. 
Louis wrote: “I’ve been living in St Louis for over a decade, but I’ll never be from here. 
I am choosing to live and raise my family here (happily!) 
and I think that choice gives people like me a voice in our home.” 
Calling in an expert 
After the social media callout didn’t provide a definitive answer, I contacted someone who knew my struggle: my longtime colleague Jo Mannies. 
Like me, Mannies has lived in Missouri for more than half of her life. 
But she has extensive ties to Indiana  so much so that I often call Jo one of the most prominent Hoosiers. 
“When you think about your formative years when you grew up  for some people that has a stronger impact on their lives because that shaped who they are,” Mannies said. 
“I have to say Indiana, in that sense, because I wasਨ born and raised in Indiana, and I went to college in Indiana, and my first newspaper job was in Indiana.” 
In fact, Mannies’ father was so well-known as a high school basketball coach that political heavyweights like Birch Bayh knew his name. 
She added that Indiana politicians often played up their longstanding ties to the state, much like Missouri elected officials brag about how they’re fifth-, sixth- or seventh-generation residents. 
“I think it's true in a lot of states where politicians who want to get elected to office do want the public to think they are one of them, even if they weren't one of them all of their lives, especially their younger years,” Mannies said. 
Mannies contends that I’m probably a “hybrid Missourian,” since I spent my formative years in Illinois. 
And I was tempted to accept her decision. 
But to me, being a Missourian means that you’ve made a tangible investment in where the state goes into the future  even if the state’s people or governmental leaders occasionally disappoint you. 
Being a Missourian provides you with motivation to help push Missouri in a better direction. 
And not just for yourself, but for your neighbors, your friends and your children. 
So even though it would be easiest to say I’m a Missourian who was born in Illinois, the fact remains that I live in Missouri. 
I vote in Missouri. 
I go on vacations in Missouri. 
I hike at Missouri state parks. 
And I hope to spend the rest of my life in Missouri. 
Whatever J.Lo thinks about New Yorkers  I am a Missourian. 
“St. 
Louis on the Air” brings you the stories of St. 
Louis and the people who live, work and create in our region. 
The show is produced by Miya Norfleet, Emily Woodbury, Danny Wicentowski, Elaine Cha and Alex Heuer. 
Layla Halilbasic is our production assistant. 
The audio engineer is Aaron Doerr. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 7.1%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias3.8%This article: 0.4%Jason Rosenbaum: 8.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect0.4%This article: 3.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion3.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect8.3%This article: 4.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 6.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias7.7%This article: 3.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias3.7%This article: 4.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error4.8%This article: 3.3%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.3%This article: 5.4%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias5.4%This article: 3.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.7%This article: 6.5%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias1.8%This article: 1.5%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority9.9%This article: 5.4%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma5.4%This article: 3.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 3.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning3.9%This article: 14.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization14.9%This article: 1.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring1.8%This article: 1.3%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon1.3%This article: 6.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 7.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion6.6%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 1.3%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque1.3%This article: 1.5%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof1.5%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.1%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division5.1%This article: 15.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal15.0%This article: 3.4%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman3.4%This article: 1.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote5.8%This article: 1.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.8%This article: 10.4%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice10.4%This article: 1.3%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination1.3%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

848 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers29%attributed speech599writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageMike Parson • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageClaire McCaskill • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKate Stowe • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageChristy McVicker Ryan • 18 words • 0.0% coverageChristy McVicker Ryan • 11 words • 0.0% coverageChristy McVicker Ryan • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageJo Mannies • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJo Mannies • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJo Mannies • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJo Mannies • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageorganization: St. Louis on the Air • 10 words • 0.0% coverageorganization: St. Louis on the Air • 12 words • 0.0% coverageorganization: St. Louis on the Air • 16 words • 0.0% coverageorganization: St. Louis on the Air • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jo Mannies

100%flagged-word coverage
136 attributed words55% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote+22.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jo Mannies: 22.8%22.8%Biased Writer Voice-14.7 ptsWriter: 14.7%Jo Mannies: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Jo Mannies: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Jo Mannies: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.