Keyword summary
88%1 analyzed article/video2,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Power results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,060 hits. Analysis detected 8,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,132 of 35,675 keywords). This Political Power is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Political Power
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
50%Political Power (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,728
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.7%13.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos