Keyword summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Misconduct results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 840 hits. Analysis detected 4,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (6,628 of 37,536 keywords). This Political Misconduct is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Political Misconduct
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠83%Political Misconduct (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510082.3% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 32.2%32.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 21.6%21.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 32.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos