Keyword summary
34% 1 analyzed article/video 1,485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Consulting results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 455 hits . Analysis detected 2,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,455 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (24,266 of 35,648 keywords). This Political Consulting is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Political Consulting
Keyword details
Total words: 4,455
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst