Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Candidates results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 275 hits . Analysis detected 1,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,833 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,639 of 37,536 keywords). This Political Candidates is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group. Political Candidates
Keyword details
Total words: 1,833
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.0% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst